Definition of the Iraqi investigator for etymology

Definition of the Iraqi investigator for etymology:

As for the definition of the Iraqi investigator (may his secret sanctify) (and he (sanctifying his secret) focused on repelling the first blame), he (may God have mercy on him) mentioned: that a fundamental rule is an extraneous rule in deduction in a way that the same rule becomes when a jurisprudential ruling is deduced from it that is subject to the ruling or how it relates to its subject Looking at that, for example, the rule for the signification of the command over the obligation is to establish the obligation, while the reliability of the narrator or the appearance of the word “the level” are not subject to the rule from the beginning, even if we use them in the place of deducing the rule, and therefore if we lose sight of the world of rulings, there is no meaning Because we say: (The command indicates that it is obligatory); As obligatory is a ruling from

 

(1) We may say: It is sufficient in the fundamentalism of the rule to derive from it the universal divine judgment, even without excusing or excusing, and the rule (the command of something requires the prohibition of its opposite, or does not require) a rule from which deduces the prohibition or inviolability of the opposite, and it is a divine total judgment . Or it may be said: It suffices in its fundamentality to produce it on some buildings, and this rule results from a building.

rulings, but there remains a meaning for our saying: (Al-Sa’id means “the face of the earth” or “Zurara is trustworthy” (1). Then it may be said: This definition does not include such as the research of concepts, or the absolute and the restricted, or the general and the particular, but he (sanctify his secret) was exposed in the articles to push this delusion with a statement: that these researches are about how the judgment relates to the subject (2), and a distinction between These researches and derivative research, as derivative research does not fall under the definition, and therefore it is not from fundamental research (3), and since its phrase in the articles is closed, it is as if some of them did not pay attention to the meaning, and that is why it was questioned that we did not understand the difference between these researches and the derivative research that It is outside the science of etymology, for the derivation’s research also talks about the limits of the subject. Is it specific to the one who actually possesses the principle or is it more general than that, for example? And the clarification of his intention (may his secret be sanctified) is: that the fundamental rule, when it has an effect on the ruling, is subject to the directness of the ruling or to the specificity of the ruling, and the study of the significance of the condition on the concept, for example, has an effect on the ruling when the penalty is one of the rulings, and the rule at that time is subject to the specificity of the ruling. judgment; As it is exposed to the fact that the penalty - which is the ruling according to the imposition - is restricted by the limits of the condition circle, and that it is negated by the absence of the condition, and this is in contrast to the search for an individual meaning such as the word "level", as it does not speak of a specificity in the ruling, but rather talks about the individual meaning of the level that is not a judgment in Sometimes the search for it is intrusive in deducing the ruling, and also the discussion of the absolute when it affects the ruling, i.e. when it is applied. (1) Al-Maqarat, vol. 1, p. 54, according to the edition of the Islamic Thought Academy. (2) The same source and page. (3) The same source, p. 55.

rulings, but there remains a meaning for our saying: (Al-Sa’id means “the face of the earth” or “Zurara is trustworthy” (1). Then it may be said: This definition does not include such as the research of concepts, or the absolute and the restricted, or the general and the particular, but he (sanctify his secret) was exposed in the articles to push this delusion with a statement: that these researches are about how the judgment relates to the subject (2), and a distinction between These researches and derivative research, as derivative research does not fall under the definition, and therefore it is not from fundamental research (3), and since its phrase in the articles is closed, it is as if some of them did not pay attention to the meaning, and that is why it was questioned that we did not understand the difference between these researches and the derivative research that It is outside the science of etymology, for the derivation’s research also talks about the limits of the subject. Is it specific to the one who actually possesses the principle or is it more general than that, for example? And the clarification of his intention (may his secret be sanctified) is: that the fundamental rule, when it has an effect on the ruling, is subject to the directness of the ruling or to the specificity of the ruling, and the study of the significance of the condition on the concept, for example, has an effect on the ruling when the penalty is one of the rulings, and the rule at that time is subject to the specificity of the ruling. judgment; As it is exposed to the fact that the penalty - which is the ruling according to the imposition - is restricted by the limits of the condition circle, and that it is negated by the absence of the condition, and this is in contrast to the search for an individual meaning such as the word "level", as it does not speak of a specificity in the ruling, but rather talks about the individual meaning of the level that is not a judgment in Sometimes the search for it is intrusive in deducing the ruling, and also the discussion of the absolute when it affects the ruling, i.e. when it is applied. (1) Al-Maqarat, vol. 1, p. 54, according to the edition of the Islamic Thought Academy. (2) The same source and page. (3) The same source, p. 55.

rulings, but there remains a meaning for our saying: (Al-Sa’id means “the face of the earth” or “Zurara is trustworthy” (1). Then it may be said: This definition does not include such as the research of concepts, or the absolute and the restricted, or the general and the particular, but he (sanctify his secret) was exposed in the articles to push this delusion with a statement: that these researches are about how the judgment relates to the subject (2), and a distinction between These researches and derivative research, as derivative research does not fall under the definition, and therefore it is not from fundamental research (3), and since its phrase in the articles is closed, it is as if some of them did not pay attention to the meaning, and that is why it was questioned that we did not understand the difference between these researches and the derivative research that It is outside the science of etymology, for the derivation’s research also talks about the limits of the subject. Is it specific to the one who actually possesses the principle or is it more general than that, for example? And the clarification of his intention (may his secret be sanctified) is: that the fundamental rule, when it has an effect on the ruling, is subject to the directness of the ruling or to the specificity of the ruling, and the study of the significance of the condition on the concept, for example, has an effect on the ruling when the penalty is one of the rulings, and the rule at that time is subject to the specificity of the ruling. judgment; As it is exposed to the fact that the penalty - which is the ruling according to the imposition - is restricted by the limits of the condition circle, and that it is negated by the absence of the condition, and this is in contrast to the search for an individual meaning such as the word "level", as it does not speak of a specificity in the ruling, but rather talks about the individual meaning of the level that is not a judgment in Sometimes the search for it is intrusive in deducing the ruling, and also the discussion of the absolute when it affects the ruling, i.e. when it is applied. (1) Al-Maqarat, vol. 1, p. 54, according to the edition of the Islamic Thought Academy. (2) The same source and page. (3) The same source, p. 55.

rulings, but there remains a meaning for our saying: (Al-Sa’id means “the face of the earth” or “Zurara is trustworthy” (1). Then it may be said: This definition does not include such as the research of concepts, or the absolute and the restricted, or the general and the particular, but he (sanctify his secret) was exposed in the articles to push this delusion with a statement: that these researches are about how the judgment relates to the subject (2), and a distinction between These researches and derivative research, as derivative research does not fall under the definition, and therefore it is not from fundamental research (3), and since its phrase in the articles is closed, it is as if some of them did not pay attention to the meaning, and that is why it was questioned that we did not understand the difference between these researches and the derivative research that It is outside the science of etymology, for the derivation’s research also talks about the limits of the subject. Is it specific to the one who actually possesses the principle or is it more general than that, for example? And the clarification of his intention (may his secret be sanctified) is: that the fundamental rule, when it has an effect on the ruling, is subject to the directness of the ruling or to the specificity of the ruling, and the study of the significance of the condition on the concept, for example, has an effect on the ruling when the penalty is one of the rulings, and the rule at that time is subject to the specificity of the ruling. judgment; As it is exposed to the fact that the penalty - which is the ruling according to the imposition - is restricted by the limits of the condition circle, and that it is negated by the absence of the condition, and this is in contrast to the search for an individual meaning such as the word "level", as it does not speak of a specificity in the ruling, but rather talks about the individual meaning of the level that is not a judgment in Sometimes the search for it is intrusive in deducing the ruling, and also the discussion of the absolute when it affects the ruling, i.e. when it is applied. (1) Al-Maqarat, vol. 1, p. 54, according to the edition of the Islamic Thought Academy. (2) The same source and page. (3) The same source, p. 55.

rulings, but there remains a meaning for our saying: (Al-Sa’id means “the face of the earth” or “Zurara is trustworthy” (1). Then it may be said: This definition does not include such as the research of concepts, or the absolute and the restricted, or the general and the particular, but he (sanctify his secret) was exposed in the articles to push this delusion with a statement: that these researches are about how the judgment relates to the subject (2), and a distinction between These researches and derivative research, as derivative research does not fall under the definition, and therefore it is not from fundamental research (3), and since its phrase in the articles is closed, it is as if some of them did not pay attention to the meaning, and that is why it was questioned that we did not understand the difference between these researches and the derivative research that It is outside the science of etymology, for the derivation’s research also talks about the limits of the subject. Is it specific to the one who actually possesses the principle or is it more general than that, for example? And the clarification of his intention (may his secret be sanctified) is: that the fundamental rule, when it has an effect on the ruling, is subject to the directness of the ruling or to the specificity of the ruling, and the study of the significance of the condition on the concept, for example, has an effect on the ruling when the penalty is one of the rulings, and the rule at that time is subject to the specificity of the ruling. judgment; As it is exposed to the fact that the penalty - which is the ruling according to the imposition - is restricted by the limits of the condition circle, and that it is negated by the absence of the condition, and this is in contrast to the search for an individual meaning such as the word "level", as it does not speak of a specificity in the ruling, but rather talks about the individual meaning of the level that is not a judgment in Sometimes the search for it is intrusive in deducing the ruling, and also the discussion of the absolute when it affects the ruling, i.e. when it is applied. (1) Al-Maqarat, vol. 1, p. 54, according to the edition of the Islamic Thought Academy. (2) The same source and page. (3) The same source, p. 55.

rulings, but there remains a meaning for our saying: (Al-Sa’id means “the face of the earth” or “Zurara is trustworthy” (1). Then it may be said: This definition does not include such as the research of concepts, or the absolute and the restricted, or the general and the particular, but he (sanctify his secret) was exposed in the articles to push this delusion with a statement: that these researches are about how the judgment relates to the subject (2), and a distinction between These researches and derivative research, as derivative research does not fall under the definition, and therefore it is not from fundamental research (3), and since its phrase in the articles is closed, it is as if some of them did not pay attention to the meaning, and that is why it was questioned that we did not understand the difference between these researches and the derivative research that It is outside the science of etymology, for the derivation’s research also talks about the limits of the subject. Is it specific to the one who actually possesses the principle or is it more general than that, for example? And the clarification of his intention (may his secret be sanctified) is: that the fundamental rule, when it has an effect on the ruling, is subject to the directness of the ruling or to the specificity of the ruling, and the study of the significance of the condition on the concept, for example, has an effect on the ruling when the penalty is one of the rulings, and the rule at that time is subject to the specificity of the ruling. judgment; As it is exposed to the fact that the penalty - which is the ruling according to the imposition - is restricted by the limits of the condition circle, and that it is negated by the absence of the condition, and this is in contrast to the search for an individual meaning such as the word "level", as it does not speak of a specificity in the ruling, but rather talks about the individual meaning of the level that is not a judgment in Sometimes the search for it is intrusive in deducing the ruling, and also the discussion of the absolute when it affects the ruling, i.e. when it is applied. (1) Al-Maqarat, vol. 1, p. 54, according to the edition of the Islamic Thought Academy. (2) The same source and page. (3) The same source, p. 55.